Division Names Preview: OTA

These are the current names being used for the Different Transhuman Arm Branch, their purposes and descriptions will be announced later.

Feel free to speculate


ARM

PIN

HAWKEYE

TALON

WING

VERTICAL

SHIELD

SHADE

Milkdairy wrote:These are the current names being used for the Different Transhuman Arm Branch, their purposes and descriptions will be announced later.

Feel free to speculate


ARM

PIN

HAWKEYE

TALON

WING

VERTICAL

SHIELD

SHADE

here's how these division names look in my eyes


ARM: no clue, possibly a heavy weapons division

PIN: perhaps a division who's key goal is to suppress targets in combat, i.e pin down.

HAWKEYE: probably a marksman/long range intelligence division

TALON: Not sure

WING: not sure, maybe airwatch

VERTICAL: Maybe airwatch, idk.

SHIELD: Medical division c:

SHADE: probably a stealth division, either that or an intelligence division, or both! : O

I liked it better...

... When the OTA names /didn't/ suck.

Kitsune™ wrote:I liked it better...

... When the OTA names /didn't/ suck.

Are you capable of anything OTHER than destructive criticism?

Shisno wrote:

Kitsune™ wrote:I liked it better...

... When the OTA names /didn't/ suck.

Are you capable of anything OTHER than destructive criticism?

fukn faget wats ur problm?
/Serious time
The names are pretty nice in my opinion. Would like to discuss them with Milk and Shisno.

Shisno wrote:

Kitsune™ wrote:I liked it better...

... When the OTA names /didn't/ suck.

Are you capable of anything OTHER than destructive criticism?

Well, I am, I'm capable of criticism that gets me banned, beat that!


ooser was PERMIBAND for dis poste for reesin: (JOKE BAN) -mlikdiary

Shisno wrote:

Kitsune™ wrote:I liked it better...

... When the OTA names /didn't/ suck.

Are you capable of anything OTHER than destructive criticism?

Obviously.

I've done constructive criticism. Thing is, the community has a LOT of dickheads who hate me, and have given me dickhead-ivitis. Therefore, I just stick to destructive criticism since I see NO point in trying to be constructive anymore.

Kitsune™ wrote:

Shisno wrote:

Kitsune™ wrote:I liked it better...

... When the OTA names /didn't/ suck.

Are you capable of anything OTHER than destructive criticism?

Obviously.

I've done constructive criticism. Thing is, the community has a LOT of dickheads who hate me, and have given me dickhead-ivitis. Therefore, I just stick to destructive criticism since I see NO point in trying to be constructive anymore.

Here's a thought, if you don't have anything constructive to contribute, don't post anything at all.

Shisno wrote:

Kitsune™ wrote:

Shisno wrote:

Kitsune™ wrote:I liked it better...

... When the OTA names /didn't/ suck.

Are you capable of anything OTHER than destructive criticism?

Obviously.

I've done constructive criticism. Thing is, the community has a LOT of dickheads who hate me, and have given me dickhead-ivitis. Therefore, I just stick to destructive criticism since I see NO point in trying to be constructive anymore.

Here's a thought, if you don't have anything constructive to contribute, don't post anything at all.

Hate to break it to you shisno, but destructive criticism IS constructive, it's just how you perceive it, you know what the say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, change eye to criticism and my point still stands.

The beauty in the eye of the beholder analogy doesn't apply here. Her criticism was purely destructive, as she didn't even offer any alternatives.

Shisno wrote:The beauty in the eye of the beholder analogy doesn't apply here. Her criticism was purely destructive, as she didn't even offer any alternatives.

you don't NEED to offer alternatives for it to be helpful, it just needs to be... logical

I agree with Shisno on this one. We want helpful criticism. If you hate the names, explain why. Why are the names awful to you, and if you're not sure why, provide some other names.